National Energy Transitions

national energy

National Energy Transitions

Journal Article ‘Integrating techno-economic, socio-technical and political perspectives on national energy transitions: A meta-theoretical framework’ co-authored by Professor Benjamin Sovacool.

News Item posted on the Centre on Innovation and Energy Demand (CIED) website on 9 February 2018.

A new journal article co-authored by CIED Director Professor Benjamin Sovacool looks at the way perspectives on national energy transitions could be integrated to be able to explain the complexity of transitions.

Highlights

  • 3 perspectives on energy transitions: techno-economic, socio-technical and political.
  • The techno-economic perspective has roots in energy systems analysis and economics.
  • The socio-technical perspective has roots in evolutionary economics and STS.
  • The political perspective has roots in political science and political economy.
  • The perspectives structure a multi-tier framework with hierarchically organized variables.

Abstract

Economic development, technological innovation, and policy change are especially prominent factors shaping energy transitions. Therefore explaining energy transitions requires combining insights from disciplines investigating these factors. The existing literature is not consistent in identifying these disciplines nor proposing how they can be combined. We conceptualize national energy transitions as a co-evolution of three types of systems: energy flows and markets, energy technologies, and energy-related policies. The focus on the three types of systems gives rise to three perspectives on national energy transitions: techno-economic with its roots in energy systems analysis and various domains of economics; socio-technical with its roots in sociology of technology, STS, and evolutionary economics; and political with its roots in political science. We use the three perspectives as an organizing principle to propose a meta-theoretical framework for analyzing national energy transitions. Following Elinor Ostrom’s approach, the proposed framework explains national energy transitions through a nested conceptual map of variables and theories. In comparison with the existing meta-theoretical literature, the three perspectives framework elevates the role of political science since policies are likely to be increasingly prominent in shaping 21st century energy transitions.

A full version of the paper is available to download on the ScienceDirect website.
A brief overview of the End Use Energy Demand Centres (EUED) Centres.